Part 2 of a 4 part series
by
Les
Palmer
(Editor's note: This is the second in a series of four columns on the
controversial subject of subsistence fishing on the Kenai Peninsula.)
A few "rural" residents
of Ninilchik and their lawyer are determined to put subsistence gill nets in
the Kenai and Kasilof rivers, where no such nets have been for more than 50
years.Because subsistence fishing has a priority over all other kinds, it can shut
down or restrict all other kinds. For that reason and others, it's
important to know just what "subsistence" means.
Lots of people misuse the word "subsistence." Dip netting reds at the mouth
of the Kenai or Kasilof rivers is personal-use fishing, not subsistence
fishing. The Native gill-net fisheries at the mouths of the Kenai, Kasilof
and Ninilchik rivers are state-approved educational fisheries, not
subsistence fisheries.Two
laws deal with subsistence in Alaska, one state, the other federal. Below,
I'll address only what affects fishing on the Kenai Peninsula and adjacent
waters.
Under state law:
-
All Alaska
residents are entitled to subsistence.
-
State subsistence
fisheries are managed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game,
Division of Commercial Fisheries. The Alaska Board of Fisheries creates
subsistence regulations, with advice from local Fish and Game Advisory
Committees.
-
State subsistence
law applies to all state-owned and privately owned lands, including
those owned by Native corporations, and to waters on and running through
these lands, as well as most marine waters.
-
State law excludes
subsistence uses in five "nonsubsistence areas." These include lands and
waters around Valdez, Juneau, Ketchikan, Fairbanks and the
Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai areas. Nearly all Kenai Peninsula residents are
in the Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai Nonsubsistence Area. According to state
regulations, a nonsubsistence area is "an area or community where
dependence upon subsistence is not a principal characteristic of the
economy, culture, and way of life of the area or community." Only
sport, commercial and personal-use fishing are allowed in a
nonsubsistence area.
-
In the Cook Inlet
drainage, subsistence fishing under state regulations now occurs in only
five places, all of them unconnected to the highway system. About 10
miles of Cook Inlet beach in the Tyonek area is open to subsistence
salmon fishing. At Squentna, on the Yentna River, just upstream from
the nonsubsistence boundary, subsistence salmon fishing is done by fish
wheel. On the lower Kenai Peninsula, subsistence salmon fishing is
allowed in the Toyuktolik and Port Graham subdistricts, and in and near
Seldovia Bay.
Under federal law:
- Only federally qualified "rural" residents have subsistence rights. On the
Kenai Peninsula, the Federal Subsistence Board has ruled that only residents
of Hope, Cooper Landing and Ninilchik have "customary and traditional" use
of the fish in the Kenai River.
- Federal subsistence fisheries are managed by Alaska's five federal
landlords, who sit on the Federal Subsistence Board. This board, with
advice from 10 Regional Advisory Councils, creates subsistence regulations
for federal lands and waters. Parts of the Kenai and Kasilof rivers lie
within the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, which is managed by the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service. The upper Kenai River is in the Chugach National
Forest, and is managed by the U.S. Forest Service.
- Federal subsistence law applies to nearly all federal lands and the waters
within the boundaries of those lands.
- Federal law (ANILCA) gives Alaska's commonly owned resources only to "rural"
residents. ANILCA doesn't define "rural" or "customary and traditional," so
the feds made up their own definitions. These tend to be inclusive, which
not only puts a strain on resources, but causes no end of bad feelings.
One
major difference between state and federal law is the amount of clout held
by the advisory groups. The state's advisory committees are simply advisory
to the boards of fisheries and game. The federal subsistence advisory
councils recommendations on proposals must be upheld by the Federal
Subsistence Board unless they are damaging to subsistence, damaging to the
resource, or not supported by evidence.
Opponents of the federal "rural" subsistence preference say that the state's
subsistence law satisfies the "equal rights" provisions in the Alaska
Constitution, while the federal law tramples on these provisions.
Personally, I think a rural preference — albeit much more exclusive than the
existing one — is the best way to dole out resources, if and when they need
to be doled. If it were up to me, the entire Kenai Peninsula, excepting the
two isolated Native villages on the southernmost end, would be classified as
"non-rural." Given that we have personal-use fisheries that provide for
residents, and that local residents automatically have a "priority" of
sorts, this is the best, most sensible way to maximize fishing opportunities
for all.
The
feds, however, have chosen to create "haves" and "have nots" along our road
system. The same people we see while shopping at Fred Meyer's Friday
morning will be fishing a gill net in the Kenai River that afternoon. These
"rural" residents will have to drive 60 to 80 miles from Ninilchik to reach
the Kenai, which has for some time been the most popular sport-fishing river
in the state.
If
they were purposely trying to start a fight, they could do no better.
Les Palmer lives in Sterling, a federally designated
"non-rural" community.Part 3 -
Fish Fight in the Offing
|